DeployHQ vs CircleCI
CircleCI excels at CI. DeployHQ excels at deployment. Get built-in rollbacks, zero-downtime deployments, and a simpler setup for the deployment step of your workflow.
Feature Comparison
A side-by-side look at what each platform offers.
| Feature | DeployHQ | CircleCI |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment-focused | ✓ | CI-focused |
| One-click rollback | ✓ | ✗ |
| Turbo deployments | ✓ | Custom config |
| GUI-based configuration | ✓ | YAML config |
| FTP/SFTP deployment | ✓ | Custom scripts |
| Build pipelines | ✓ | ✓ |
| Deploy behind firewalls | ✓ | Self-hosted runners |
| Test parallelism | ✗ | ✓ |
| Test splitting | ✗ | ✓ |
| Orbs ecosystem | ✗ | ✓ |
| Docker layer caching | ✗ | ✓ |
| Multiple Git providers | ✓ | ✓ |
Where DeployHQ Wins
Key advantages that set DeployHQ apart.
Deployment-First Design
Every feature in DeployHQ is designed around deployment. You're not configuring a CI tool to also handle deployment — you're using a tool built specifically for it.
One-Click Rollback
Roll back to any previous deployment with one click. CircleCI has no built-in rollback mechanism — you'd need to re-run a previous pipeline or revert commits.
Simpler Configuration
Configure deployments through a GUI. No YAML files to maintain, no config syntax to learn, no debugging pipeline definitions.
Deploy Behind Firewalls
Deploy to servers behind firewalls using our deploy agent, without opening inbound ports or setting up self-hosted runners.
Detailed Comparison
CI vs CD Focus
CircleCI is a continuous integration platform — its strength is running tests, building artifacts, and automating CI workflows. Deployment is an additional step you configure yourself. DeployHQ is focused entirely on deployment, providing built-in features for getting code to servers reliably.
Configuration Approach
CircleCI uses YAML configuration files that can become complex for multi-environment deployments. DeployHQ uses a GUI-based approach — point and click to configure servers, environments, and deployment rules.
Using Both Together
The most powerful setup for many teams is using CircleCI for CI (testing, building) and DeployHQ for deployment. CircleCI ensures your code is tested, and DeployHQ ensures it's deployed reliably with rollback support.
Who Should Use What?
Best for the deployment step
- You want a dedicated deployment tool
- You need built-in rollbacks
- You prefer GUI over YAML configuration
- You deploy to servers via FTP, SFTP, or SSH
Best for CI-heavy workflows
- You need powerful test parallelism
- You want a comprehensive CI/CD platform
- You need the Orbs ecosystem
- You need Docker layer caching
Ready for Better Deployments?
Use the best tool for each job. Let CircleCI handle CI, and let DeployHQ handle deployment.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between DeployHQ and CircleCI?
DeployHQ is focused on deployment — getting your code from a Git repository to your server. CircleCI is a CI-first platform focused on continuous integration (building, testing, and running workflows), with deployment as an additional capability.
Can I use DeployHQ and CircleCI together?
Yes. Many teams use CircleCI for CI (running tests, building assets) and DeployHQ for the deployment step. CircleCI handles the testing pipeline, and DeployHQ deploys the tested code to production with rollback support.
Does DeployHQ have CI features like CircleCI?
DeployHQ includes build pipelines that can run build commands (npm install, composer install, etc.) before deployment. However, it does not include CI testing features like test parallelism or test splitting that CircleCI offers.
Get started today for just $9/month
That's unlimited deployments and 3 projects.